via www.20x200.com
Monteiro's prints are at 20x200. You should buy one; you owe it to yourself after surviving the holidays.
« November 2010 | Main | January 2011 »
via www.20x200.com
Monteiro's prints are at 20x200. You should buy one; you owe it to yourself after surviving the holidays.
Yesterday we threw the kids in the car (not quite literally) and after dropping extended family at SFO trekked across 92 to Half Moon Bay. Yes, it was cold and rainy. But we needed to get the munchkins out of the house before they destroyed it. And each other. And us.
Before leaving, I emailed friend of the show and HMB resident Andrew Anker and asked him for some restaurant recommendations. He came through with a great list, and in the spirit of service blogging he's posted it to quid.pro: 7 Places to Eat in Half Moon Bay. It's a good list, and more proof that top tens are so over.
Top tens are so over. Here are my top 9 favorite tracks from 2010.
The first two I have to put on there because I'm a white guy over the age of 40. Two songs about telephones, both of which had excellent music videos (go watch them). Rihanna because even though people think she's a robot I thought she chewed up the stage on Letterman. (Mmmm, robots.) Kanye because. Sade as the anti-Kanye, and that whole record kills. James Blake's cover of the Feist song is mind-blowing, the video makes it better, and that's even before I understood his whole "thing" with the dubstep. And finally, as previously tweeted, Reznor clearly trumped Daft Punk in the great soundtrack war of 2010, and the reprise of Hand Covers Bruise, which comes about 3/4th of the way through the record knocks your socks off the way reprises should.
This is a great, great line...
To watch it is to slowly succumb to a kind of corporate poison that spreads through your veins like embalming fluid, causing your skin and your soul to turn gray.
Because maybe it will make more sense to you this way, here's a computerized voice reading Steve Gillmor's latest TechCrunch column, The @Mention Cloud.
BTW, didn't work for me.
John Scharffenberger (just typing the name makes my mouth water...) is now CEO of Hodo Soy Beanery, "an artisan food factory that makes products from organic, non-GMO soybeans."
Prediction: gourmet tofu will go mainstream in the next 24 months.
They're here; I particularly enjoyed this bit about his top pick, The Social Network:
The tension in the film is between Zuckerberg and the Winklevoss twins, who may well have invented Facebook for all I know, but are traditional analog humans motivated by pride and possessiveness. If Zuckerberg took their idea and ran with it, it was because he saw it as a logical insight rather than intellectual property. Some films observe fundamental shifts in human nature, and this is one of them.
Also? Sounds like I really need to see The American.
Three small things about the rumored impending sunsetting of Delicious.
First, it's easy to grab an archive of all your bookmarks, and there are plenty of services that you can import them into. But I never used Delicious as something to "store" things, I used it as a place for link blogging. Delicious wasn't about personal utility, it was about public performance.
So I just grabbed my archives and put them up here, where it's back to being about personal utility. Bookmark activity back to 2003! Kind of fun, actually.
Second, one of the things I found there was a December 2003 bit in NTK, the fantastic brit email newsletter from the early aughts, about del.icio.us itself. I've screenshotted the paragraph because if you were around the web then and read NTK, it will send you down a nostalgia tunnel so deep and long as to have no end.
Third, while having no clue what the hell Yahoo!! (so great now it deserves two exclamation points) is doing shuttering one of their Web 2.0 darlings, I absolutely loved this tweet from @fakecarolbartz.
At the risk of turning this into a Ken Norton reblog, via a comment from him on yesterday's Groupon copywriting post comes the Public Groupon Voice Guide, "intended to help new and applying writers lean Groupon's signature writing style."
The voice guide includes instructions to use all the things you're taught to avoid as a young writer...
So good.
I'm sure you're following The Big Picture's 2010 in Photos series (here's Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3). They're all great, but this one is my favorite.
Action and drama and fear and storytelling and metaphor, all wrapped up in one. The photos of the plane fireballing into the runway don't have near the impact of this one.
I seriously love reading Groupon deals every day; their copywriting is really, really good. How can you not get interested in a local wine bar deal with a lede like this?
Unlike Similac baby formula, which is unfairly reserved for babies and experimenting teens, wine can also be consumed by adults.
Kudos, Groupon copywriters. I salute you.
Mat Honan on what comes next with Gawkergate: troll hunt!
I’ll be amazed if in the coming weeks we don’t learn several identities behind a lot of the Gawker commenter accounts. Sometimes it might be because the commenter had a clear bias or conflict of interest they should have disclosed. Others it’s just going to be because a famous person is involved. (And have you seen how many famous people—celebrities and media bigwigs—there are in there?) And of course sometimes names will just come out because someone is a dick.
Hello, The Awl. Sounds like a job for y'all. (Yes, I made that rhyme on purpose.)
You know what I love about blogging? That I can toss off a quick kneejerk post about the new Google Latitude iPhone app, and get a thoughtful and well-reasoned response from Ken Norton, the product manager of Google Latitude. (It probably helps that Ken's a friend; I don't think I have every PM on every Internet product reading my blog...but hey, a boy can dream.)
Ken's comment is on the original post of course, but it's worthwhile promoting it to the front page so that folks consuming the feed get the benefit of seeing it.
Since I'm the PM for Google Latitude, let me try to respond.
I've never been one to let the mainstream media dictate my product positioning, so let's set that aside for the moment. Here in the High Tech Octagon we sometimes overlook and important fact: for the majority of consumers, a mobile phone is a tool for staying in contact with close friends and loved ones. Yes, it's hard to believe when the echo chamber is awash with people using smartphones as a megaphone for broadcasting their every movement and whim to the entire planet.
Latitude has never been a product intended to be used with many, many people. It is, quite simply, a way to keep in contact with a very few number of your closest friends and family members. How do consumers do that today? With voice and text messages - "when are you leaving?" and "where are you?" and "how far away are you?" Just yesterday I received a testimonial from a user who got off at the wrong train station and was completely lost. He called his wife who was able to use Latitude to find his location and rescue him. We hear stories about former abused partners who share their location with a best friend just in case. I'm a cyclist and it gives me (and my family) peace of mind to know they can see where I am when I'm riding or driving to events.
Furthermore, Latitude has a pretty sweet "single player experience." Even if you're not sharing with anyone our History Dashboard is incredibly useful and magical. Privacy has been a *feature* of Latitude since we launched - you have complete control over who you're sharing with, you can choose to share your closest location, city-level or hide. We also send you email reminders when Latitude is enabled just in case you forgot, or in the event that somebody has enabled it on your phone without your consent.
Latitude isn't trying to be Twitter, and it's not Foursquare. That's not the point. So rather than asking "why would I want to share my location continuously with the entire world?!" ask yourself "would it be useful if I could continuously share my location with my best friend/spouse/partner/parent/loved one?"
Here's my response to Ken...
I understand the benefit of Latitude, and also the challenges of communicating those both inside and outside of the Tech Octagon. Frankly, I think the user model and benefit of Latitude ("let me make sure my close friends and family know where I am") makes a lot more sense for average users than the check-in model of Foursquare or even Facebook Places. And I get the privacy controls, and honestly do appreciate the periodic (monthly?) reminders I get from Latitude about what information I'm sharing and with whom.
My kneejerk reaction was to the continuous sharing. I understand how there would be benfit of doing that with (very close) friends and family. And I'm sure at some point I will turn that feature on (or turn it on for my kids) and will appreciate it. But I can't be the only one that has a visceral reaction to real time location sharing *with Google*, which is necessary and obvious to share that location with friends & family through Latitude. I'm happy to be accused of playing inside baseball here, but at some point people are going to want to know if / how that location data is being used at Google to make other services (advertising) more effective. The Mobile Privacy Policy is reasonably broad on this point, and all the help docs are solely focused on how you have control over what information is shared with other users, and how they can see / not see that data.
And note to self: less kneejerking next time.
More comments welcome.
From MLBTradeRumors coverage of Cliff Lee:
Phillies fans are surely thrilled to have Lee back in Philadelphia, but the MLB Players Association won't necessarily like his decision to leave so much money on the table instead of setting a precedent for other pitchers. However, this offseason has seen two free agents (Werth and Crawford) sign nine-figure contracts, so players are doing well in general.
Emphasis mine.
Here's the lede of the blog post announcing the new Google Latitude app for iPhone.
“Where are you?”
Starting today, you’ll never again have to answer (or ask) that question when you’re on the go with your iPhone. With the new Google Latitude app for iPhone, you can see where your friends are and now, continuously share where you are – even in the background once you’ve closed the app.
Is it just me, or is leading with this "benefit" incredibly tone deaf? The mainstream media is awash with stories about how consumers are being tracked eight ways from Sunday, and Google decides that continuously sharing your physical location with them is the best way to sell their new app?
Forrester speaks...
For the first time ever, the average US online consumer spends as much time online as he or she does watching TV offline.
...and around the world thousands of media strategist and planner types update their Powerpoint presentations to note that the lines have actually crossed.
Zach Seward blew my mind with his latest post Arduino, where he weaves a sampled page of Robin Sloan's Annabel Scheme directly into the post. You have to see / read it to believe it.
This photo from the August 8, 1969 photo shoot of the Abbey Road cover. (via kottke)
And this undated (but most likely from around the same time) hand-written letter from John Lennon barring McCartney from accessing any tapes of the Beatles. (via Letters of Note)
Breaks your heart.
Tim Berners-Lee on the future of journalism:
"Journalists need to be data-savvy. It used to be that you would get stories by chatting to people in bars, and it still might be that you'll do it that way some times. But now it's also going to be about poring over data and equipping yourself with the tools to analyse it and picking out what's interesting. And keeping it in perspective, helping people out by really seeing where it all fits together, and what's going on in the country."
Guardian story found via Flowing Data.