My quick take on the iPad: this really is an entirely new class of device. Not because of the form factor (neat!) or the technology (fast!) or the vertically integrated content distribution channel (smart!). Instead, the iPad is something new because of its intended use. I see the iPad not as the next evolution of the personal computer, but instead the beginning of the family computer.*
It looks like a great machine to travel from the living room to the kitchen to the kids room to the bedroom. We'll search the web on it, read the news on it, the kids will do email on it, play Brushes and Bejeweled on it, and it'll be the perfect complement to the Sunday afternoon TV football ritual. We'll use it to control the music in the house, and do some quick bet-settling during dinner. I'm sure we'll eventually enjoy some multiplayer "board" games on it, or read a book on it, or watch a TV show on it. And the kids will argue with each other over who gets it next. (Dad will.)
Essentially, this is already how my iPhone gets used when I'm at home. So a family iPhone with a bigger screen? Sign us up.
* To be clear, I define "family" in the most expansive How Berkeley-Can-You-Be kind of way. I thought about using the term "social" computer, but the term "social" has been so deeply coopted to imply "social networking" or "social media" that it just doesn't fit here. Yes, of course you'll use the iPad to do those things, but that's not what I mean in defining the device this way. Thus "family," which implies lots of things, including multiple individuals living under one roof, sharing things with one another. It's my lens, and I'm seeing through it.
This was my big hope too! So why, o why, couldn't they make it a multi-user device? My iPhone looks completely different than my wife's iPhone, which looks completely different than the kids' iPod Touches. I would love to be able to pass the iPad around the family, each with their own email addresses, Tweetie accounts, and apps. But it looks like that's just not realistic at this point. Which is a real bummer.
That and the lack of the webcam for Skype, that is :)
Posted by: Elunt | Jan 27, 2010 at 07:31 PM
I think that will come eventually; maybe as part of iPhone OS v4? They'll chalk it up as a learning from how people are using the device, and expose APIs for the apps so that they can be used by multiple users yet store data separately for each user. So yeah in the meantime if you just think if it as a shared family resource, then you'll install and run a different set of things on it. No $0.99 hott apps for you, my friend.
Big picture-ish this is interesting because until the multiuser thing comes it could mean more use of the cloud (email? just get all the kids gmail addresses) instead of Apple's rich clients.
Posted by: Michael Sippey | Jan 27, 2010 at 07:48 PM
How about casual computing? Your use cases demand a device that's lower start cost & simpler interactions. Like a smartphone, but more suited to sharing. So the software is done (mobile apps) but the form factor isn't quite right with a smartphone, hence something bigger.
Jeff Hawkins wanted this with the Palm Foleo (which never shipped) but attacked the wrong use cases (I was there, still have one, long story). Netbooks, it turns out, running desktop software are just tiny laptops. Nothing new.
So Apple makes their version of a netbook and will sell some, but not a lot, until people see the your use cases are valid - kids homework is a big one - and the price comes down a bit more. At $500 I'm not buying 2 or 3 of these to lie around the house. More likely I'll buy gen 3 or 4, or get a free one with my next iMac.
Meanwhile, a Kindle at $200-250 remains compelling.
Posted by: Davis W. Frank | Jan 27, 2010 at 08:23 PM
Oh, Michael, just indulge in your heteronormative privilege! It's okay, even in Berkeley!
Posted by: Owen Thomas | Jan 28, 2010 at 12:47 AM
My 10-year-old is going to participate in the middle school laptop education program this fall. This device comes so close to being usable for that... having Pages built in, but my guess is that they will expect a device that can take CD ROMs, be able to print, connect to a wired network, etc.
I'll do some more research though -- if the iPad could work, it would save me $500 easy, because I love my daughter and I would not subject her to a netbook.
Posted by: Brad Choate | Jan 28, 2010 at 12:56 AM
@Owen, you know me -- I excel at indulging in my heteronormative privilege! Brunch, anyone?
Posted by: Michael Sippey | Jan 28, 2010 at 01:05 AM
Indeed, my initial reaction to the device is that the iPad is the new consumer home computing device. Years ago, the iMac was introduced and filled that role. The iPad is the new iMac.
That said, it's just not my market, and I won't be buying one. I am however, really looking forward to creating apps and seeing what other developers do with the new resolution.
Web developers are probably banging their heads against their desks as they confront the idea that 1024x768 is going to be with us for a very long time.
Posted by: Octothorpe | Jan 28, 2010 at 07:59 AM
@Octothorpe -- good point! 1024x786 is definitely going to be with us for a long time. The good news about the iPad is that Apple's pretty tyrannical about minimizing browser chrome on all of their products, which means maximum real estate. Plus, in portrait mode, as demo'd yesterday, there's more opportunity for scanning and zooming... (Personally, I'm a fan of 1024x768, if one can actually be a fan of a dimension.)
Posted by: Michael Sippey | Jan 28, 2010 at 09:12 AM
I am interested in seeing how graphic design (mainly print) will evolve if/when the iPad and similar devices become more mainstream. As a designer, I try to make sure my concepts will mesh well with all mediums so I am not very concerned, but I will have to really explore ePublication now. Love to know a good place to start.
Posted by: Account Deleted | Jan 28, 2010 at 09:31 AM
@Joe, if you're looking for more about ePub, wikipedia's probably a good place to start. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPUB
Posted by: Michael Sippey | Jan 28, 2010 at 09:34 AM
Always a good place to start, thanks!
Posted by: Account Deleted | Jan 28, 2010 at 09:59 AM
Update: Savannah's future middle school is recommending students get iPads for the laptop program this fall!
Posted by: Brad Choate | Feb 26, 2010 at 08:38 PM
Wow, now that's interesting, Brad. And since they don't have webcams in them, you're guaranteed not to have issues like they did at the Lower Merion school district in PA.
Posted by: Michael Sippey | Mar 01, 2010 at 03:48 PM
Well, I'm still hoping for a built-in web cam, but even if it had one, it's a managed device, so there is no need to worry about spyware!
Posted by: Brad Choate | Mar 01, 2010 at 03:55 PM